By
AFP
Published
December 3, 2025
As anticipated, Shein’s representatives failed to seem. On Tuesday the e-commerce platform refused to attend a listening to earlier than a committee of the French National Assembly. The firm, whose world headquarters is based mostly in Singapore, had stated it might not seem till the courtroom had dominated on its suspension, and can consequently be referred to the public prosecutor.
The potential penalty is minimal: a €7,500 high quality. But it is “symbolic” in mild of the fast-fashion model’s “disrespectful” perspective, says Renaissance MP Sandrine Le Feur, chair of the National Assembly’s Committee on Sustainable Development and Spatial Planning, earlier than which the corporate had been summoned.
Shein has already been fined thrice in France this 12 months, totalling €191 million, notably for false promotions and deceptive info.
Last week, the Asian group requested an extra postponement of the listening to, arguing that it wished first to await the Paris Judicial Court’s choice on its suspension, sought by the state due to the banned merchandise it had been promoting.
Following the invention on the finish of October of child-like intercourse dolls and Category A weapons on sale, Shein was summoned for the primary time on November 18 to seem earlier than the Assembly’s fact-finding mission on checks of merchandise imported into France.
The Sustainable Development Committee then took over, summoning Shein on November 26 and once more on December 2. Each time, Shein requested a postponement due to the authorized proceedings initiated by the federal government.
No excuse
“MPs respect ongoing investigations and the separation of powers, and so this inquiry is absolutely no excuse,” stated Sandrine Le Feur. “Shocked” by Shein’s “three refusals,” she defined that referring the matter to the public prosecutor was “a first” for a standing committee of the Assembly. The referral is due to be made on Tuesday night, Ms Le Feur’s workplace instructed AFP.
In her view, Shein’s behaviour is “not acceptable.” She is significantly outraged by the Asian group’s request for a “preliminary interview(…) to ensure that the hearing takes place properly.”
Shein has taken “note” of the referral, and “reaffirms its willingness to participate in the work” of the committee, the corporate stated in a press release despatched to AFP. “We consider that any contribution must be made with due respect for the ongoing legal proceedings and once the expected decision of the judicial court has been handed down,” Shein reiterated.
A cross-party movement for a European decision can even be submitted to the Assembly’s European Affairs Committee on Wednesday, to alert Brussels and name for the suspension of the platform at EU degree. On Wednesday December 10, the excesses of e-commerce platforms will once more be on the parliamentary agenda, with the presentation of the report by the fact-finding mission on checks on imported merchandise.
Before that, Shein might be in courtroom on Friday. The state will request a three-month suspension of the positioning and a reopening topic to circumstances, beneath the supervision of Arcom, the digital regulator. The Paris public prosecutor’s workplace indicated final week {that a} three-month blocking order could possibly be thought of disproportionate in mild of the case legislation of the European Court of Human Rights.
Faced with a primary try at suspension in early November, the group withdrew the offending merchandise and suspended all gross sales made on its French web site by third-party sellers, its “marketplace,” in addition to all non-clothing gross sales.
This article is an computerized translation.
Click right here to learn the unique article.
Copyright © 2025 AFP. All rights reserved. All info displayed on this part (dispatches, pictures, logos) are protected by mental property rights owned by Agence France-Presse. As a consequence you might not copy, reproduce, modify, transmit, publish, show or in any method commercially exploit any of the contents of this part with out the prior written consent of Agence France-Presses.