The authorized crew behind the Diddy lawsuit that named Druski and Odell Beckham Jr. is looking it quits.
Legal paperwork obtained by Complex reveal that attorneys Shawn R. Perez and Ariel Mitchell, who represented Ashley Parham, Jane Doe, and John Doe in their case towards Diddy — which additionally names Druski and Odell Beckham Jr. — cited “irreconcilable differences” as their cause for desirous to withdraw from the case.
In the submitting, the attorneys claimed that their relationship with the plaintiffs had change into “unreasonably difficult.” They mentioned they’ve knowledgeable them of their choice and given him sufficient time to search out new illustration.
The attorneys additionally requested for the decide to briefly pause the case in order that the swap in attorneys doesn’t damage their possibilities in courtroom.
Last October, Parham filed the lawsuit alleging that she’d been drugged, kidnapped, and assaulted by a number of individuals after Diddy heard her saying she thought he was concerned in Tupac Shakur’s homicide in 1996. The lawsuit was amended in March, naming Druski, OBJ, and others as those that had been allegedly concerned.
Druski issued an announcement on social media shortly afterwards, writing, “This allegation is a fabricated lie. I wasn’t a public figure in 2018 — I was broke living with my mom without any connections to the entertainment industry at the time of this allegation, so the inclusion of my name is truly outlandish.”
“My heart breaks for actual victims of abuse, but I’m fully confident that the evidence will expose this falsehood and the individuals who are maliciously trying to game the legal system to pedal false narratives,” he continued.
OBJ took to social media to answer the lawsuit too. “Boy I’ll tell u what. This world makes absolutely no sense,” he wrote. “I am covered by God. He will prevail. I kno who am I , I kno who u are, keep ur head. That name will be cleared. Shxts stupid.”
In May, Druski’s authorized crew claimed in a authorized following that he couldn’t have been concerned in her assault as a result of she alleged she was assaulted by two different males.
In August, a federal decide dominated that there gave the impression to be “no reasonable factual basis” for the plaintiffs in the lawsuit to proceed alleging that Druski participated in the assault.